![]() So the answer is to engage in a Metacritic review carpet bombing, and destroy Wyatt's twitter? How noble. This is absolutely not the genre where you get into holistic debates about moral standing on how a company should make their money, and the resulting revenue streams. ![]() Its the "selective outrage" that is driving me crazy. If anything, a great early game and an apex predatory p2w endgame work in beautiful, insidious harmony. But now I also know what the rest of you believed: the whole thing is a shiny noisy front for a massive, massive scam. ![]() I know its a good game in its early stages. Remember: I have been pretty pro DI from the start. It is actually blatant and simple to understand and people are still going to get sucked into it because casinos are a thing.ĭo not mistake worthy outrage for reactive emotive anti-Blizzard rhetoric. But then I beseech you, delete the game from your everything because it is the most flagrantly merciless p2w system I have ever seen. It is fun and the gameplay is really good. Its endgame cash system should not be accepted. I know you are.Īnd I also know the gamut of mobile f2p. ![]() The term CC is straight up anti democratic, when you follow it to its logical end. CC is a poor attempt at vilifying the potential power of people collectively deciding something is not worthy of their time, support and money. Drop the 'cancel culture' fallacy please. In this case the outrage is entirely justified. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |